Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis.
McLean, Kenneth A; Knight, Stephen R; Diehl, Thomas M; Varghese, Chris; Ng, Nathan; Potter, Mark A; Zafar, Syed Nabeel; Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley; Harrison, Ewen M.
Afiliação
  • McLean KA; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Knight SR; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Diehl TM; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Varghese C; Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Ng N; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Potter MA; Colorectal Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Zafar SN; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Bouamrane MM; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Harrison EM; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: ewen.harrison@ed.ac.uk.
Lancet Digit Health ; 5(5): e295-e315, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37100544
ABSTRACT
An increasing number of digital health interventions (DHIs) for remote postoperative monitoring have been developed and evaluated. This systematic review identifies DHIs for postoperative monitoring and evaluates their readiness for implementation into routine health care. Studies were defined according to idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term follow-up (IDEAL) stages of innovation. A novel clinical innovation network analysis used coauthorship and citations to examine collaboration and progression within the field. 126 DHIs were identified, with 101 (80%) being early stage innovations (IDEAL stage 1 and 2a). None of the DHIs identified had large-scale routine implementation. There is little evidence of collaboration, and there are clear omissions in the evaluation of feasibility, accessibility, and the health-care impact. Use of DHIs for postoperative monitoring remains at an early stage of innovation, with promising but generally low-quality supporting evidence. Comprehensive evaluation within high-quality, large-scale trials and real-world data are required to definitively establish readiness for routine implementation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Telemedicina Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Telemedicina Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido