Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk-Benefit of IBD Drugs: A Physicians and Patients Survey.
D'Amico, Ferdinando; Vieujean, Sophie; Caron, Benedicte; Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent; Danese, Silvio.
Afiliação
  • D'Amico F; Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Vieujean S; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy.
  • Caron B; Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
  • Peyrin-Biroulet L; INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
  • Danese S; Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
J Clin Med ; 12(9)2023 Apr 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37176535
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment choices for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are based on the balance between risks and benefits. Our AI was to compare the perspectives of patients and physicians in evaluating the risks and benefits before initiating therapy for IBD.

METHODS:

An anonymous survey was conducted between March and August 2022. All patients with confirmed IBD and all physicians who attended an IBDscope webinar were invited to participate.

RESULTS:

In total, 367 patients and 146 physicians participated. For most patients (71.4%) and physicians (89.0%), efficacy and safety were equally important. Clinical improvement and clinical remission were the most relevant outcomes for patients (90.9 and 88.4), while clinical remission and endoscopic remission were for physicians (90.0 and 87.6). The main factors in the benefit-risk assessment were quality of life (95.1%), disease activity (87.5%), and presence of comorbidities (84.5%) for patients, and presence of comorbidities (99.3%), disease activity (97.9%), and prior failure to biologics/small molecules (96.6%) for physicians. Based on patients' and physicians' opinions, the risk of serious infections, malignancies, cardiovascular events, death, relapse, all infections, surgery, and hospitalization should be included in the benefit-risk assessment.

CONCLUSION:

Physicians and patients have different priorities in evaluating the benefit-risk balance of a new therapy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália