Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digital interventions for genomics and genetics education, empowerment, and service engagement: A systematic review.
Gasteiger, Norina; Vercell, Amy; Khan, Naz; Dowding, Dawn; Davies, Angela C; Davies, Alan.
Afiliação
  • Gasteiger N; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Vercell A; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Khan N; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Dowding D; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
  • Davies AC; Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
  • Davies A; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Community Genet ; 14(3): 227-240, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198378
BACKGROUND: Patient-facing digital technologies may reduce barriers to and alleviate the burden on genetics services. However, no work has synthesised the evidence for patient-facing digital interventions for genomics/genetics education and empowerment, or to facilitate service engagement more broadly. It is also unclear which groups have been engaged by digital interventions. AIM: This systematic review explores which existing patient-facing digital technologies have been used for genomics/genetics education and empowerment, or to facilitate service engagement, and for whom and for which purposes the interventions have been developed. METHODS: The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eight databases were searched for literature. Information was extracted into an Excel sheet and analysed in a narrative manner. Quality assessments were conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included, of which 21 were moderate or high quality. The majority (88%) were conducted in the United States of America or within a clinical setting (79%). More than half (63%) of the interventions were web-based tools, and almost all focussed on educating users (92%). There were promising results regarding educating patients and their families and facilitating engagement with genetics services. Few of the studies focussed on empowering patients or were community-based. CONCLUSION: Digital interventions may be used to deliver information about genetics concepts and conditions, and positively impact service engagement. However, there is insufficient evidence related to empowering patients and engaging underserved communities or consanguineous couples. Future work should focus on co-developing content with end users and incorporating interactive features.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Community Genet Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Community Genet Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Alemanha