Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A 7-Step Guideline for Qualitative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Health Sciences.
Glisic, Marija; Raguindin, Peter Francis; Gemperli, Armin; Taneri, Petek Eylul; Salvador, Dante Jr; Voortman, Trudy; Marques Vidal, Pedro; Papatheodorou, Stefania I; Kunutsor, Setor K; Bano, Arjola; Ioannidis, John P A; Muka, Taulant.
Afiliação
  • Glisic M; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Raguindin PF; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
  • Gemperli A; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Taneri PE; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
  • Salvador DJ; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Voortman T; Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Marques Vidal P; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
  • Papatheodorou SI; Institute of Primary and Community Care, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Kunutsor SK; HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Bano A; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Ioannidis JPA; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Muka T; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Public Health Rev ; 44: 1605454, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260612
Objectives: To provide a step-by-step, easy-to-understand, practical guide for systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of researchers with extensive experience in observational studies and systematic review and meta-analysis was established. Previous guidelines in evidence synthesis were considered. Results: There is inherent variability in observational study design, population, and analysis, making evidence synthesis challenging. We provided a framework and discussed basic meta-analysis concepts to assist reviewers in making informed decisions. We also explained several statistical tools for dealing with heterogeneity, probing for bias, and interpreting findings. Finally, we briefly discussed issues and caveats for translating results into clinical and public health recommendations. Our guideline complements "A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research" and addresses peculiarities for observational studies previously unexplored. Conclusion: We provided 7 steps to synthesize evidence from observational studies. We encourage medical and public health practitioners who answer important questions to systematically integrate evidence from observational studies and contribute evidence-based decision-making in health sciences.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Rev Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Rev Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça País de publicação: Suíça