Revisiting Bipedicled Flaps for Lower Extremity Distal Third Defects.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity reconstruction of the distal third of the leg is challenging. Free tissue transfer is the criterion standard. The COVID-19 pandemic encouraged seeking alternatives for resource consuming procedures. Bipedicled flaps are flaps with a dual-source subdermal perfusion. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of patients who had bipedicled flaps primary or auxiliary local flap for distal third leg/foot reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing lower extremity reconstruction (2020-2021) was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years with lower extremity wounds secondary to traumatic injury for which bipedicled flaps were used in the reconstruction. Exclusion criteria included lower extremity wounds secondary to peripheral vascular disease or diabetes. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the study. All patients had distal third of the leg/foot wounds, and 12 patients (87.5%) had concurrent leg fractures. In 8 patients (57.1%), the bipedicled flap was used to decrease the wound size and facilitate another concurrent flap hemisoleus (21.4%), anterior tibialis muscle turnover (14.3%), medial plantar artery (14.3%), and posterior tibial artery perforator (14.3%). Mean wound size for bipedicle flaps used alone was 42.0 ± 18.3 cm2, whereas wounds that required a bipedicled flap with an additional flap were 69.9 ± 80.8 cm2 (P = 0.187). Two patients had partial flap necrosis (14.3%) but healed their defect. One patient had nonunion (7.1%). Limb salvage rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Bipedicled flaps can be used as an alternative to free flaps in distal third leg/foot defects in select patients. If distal extremity wounds cannot be covered with a bipedicled flap alone, the flap can be used an accessory flap to facilitate reconstruction with other local flaps.