Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of frailty assessment tools used in vascular surgery research.
Welsh, Silje A; Pearson, Rebecca C; Hussey, Keith; Brittenden, Julie; Orr, Douglas J; Quinn, Terry.
Afiliação
  • Welsh SA; College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland. Electronic address: silje.welsh3@nhs.scot.
  • Pearson RC; Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Hussey K; Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Brittenden J; College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Orr DJ; College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Quinn T; College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
J Vasc Surg ; 78(6): 1567-1579.e14, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37343731
OBJECTIVE: Frailty is common in vascular patients and is recognized for its prognostic value. In the absence of consensus, a multitude of frailty assessment tools exist. This systematic review aimed to quantify the variety in these tools and describe their content and application to inform future research and clinical practice. METHODS: Multiple cross-disciplinary electronic literature databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Studies describing frailty assessment in a vascular surgical population were eligible. Data extraction to a validated template included patient demographics, tool content, and analysis methods. A secondary systematic search for papers describing the psychometric properties of commonly used frailty tools was then performed. RESULTS: Screening 5358 records identified 111 eligible studies, with an aggregate population of 5,418,236 patients. Forty-three differing frailty assessment tools were identified. One-third of these failed to assess frailty as a multidomain deficit and there was a reliance on assessing function and presence of comorbidity. Substantial methodological variability in data analysis and lack of methodological description was also identified. Published psychometric assessment was available for only 4 of the 10 most commonly used frailty tools. The Clinical Frailty Scale was the most studied and demonstrates good psychometric properties within a surgical population. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment is demonstrated, precluding meaningful comparisons of services and data pooling. A uniform approach to assessment is required to guide future frailty research. Based on the literature, we make the following recommendations: frailty should be considered a continuous construct and the reporting of frailty tools' application needs standardized. In the absence of consensus, the Clinical Frailty Scale is a validated tool with good psychometric properties that demonstrates usefulness in vascular surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Fragilidade Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Fragilidade Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos