Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hemodynamic Safety and Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Superficial Cervical Block Quality for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Study.
Skrtic, Matteo; Lijovic, Lada; Pazur, Iva; Perisa, Nikola; Radocaj, Tomislav.
Afiliação
  • Skrtic M; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Lijovic L; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Laboratory for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit, Amste
  • Pazur I; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Perisa N; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Radocaj T; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia. Electronic address: tomislav.radocaj@kbcsm.hr.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 37(10): 2006-2011, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37365071
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics (LAs) in regional anesthesia has demonstrated a positive effect on the quality of regional blocks, but there are no studies on usage in superficial cervical block (SCB) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), in which the management of mean arterial pressure is essential. The authors designed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to investigate the effects of the addition of dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamic management and quality of SCB.

DESIGN:

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING:

A single-center study at a university hospital center.

PARTICIPANTS:

Ultrasound-guided SCB was performed on 60 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades II and III undergoing elective CEA surgery who were assigned into 2 groups randomly. INTERVENTION(S) Both groups received 2 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine. The intervention group additionally received 50 µg of dexmedetomidine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

The onset and duration of sensory block and analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse effects were recorded. There were minimum effects on hemodynamic parameters and no differences in the incidence of adverse effects. The time to first analgesia was longer in the intervention group than in the control group (N = 30). There was no difference in the duration of the sensory block between groups. The log-rank test indicated a significant difference in the probability of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale <3.

CONCLUSION:

The addition of 50 µg of dexmedetomidine to 0.5% levobupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for SCB did not influence the hemodynamics and frequency of adverse effects. The median sensory block duration time showed no statistical difference between the groups, but the quality of analgesia postoperatively was much improved in the study group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Dexmedetomidina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Croácia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Dexmedetomidina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Croácia