Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Urban-rural differences in hypertension prevalence, blood pressure control, and systolic blood pressure levels.
Heindl, Brittain; Howard, George; Clarkson, Stephen; Kamin Mukaz, Debora; Lackland, Daniel; Muntner, Paul; Jackson, Elizabeth A.
Afiliação
  • Heindl B; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Howard G; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Clarkson S; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Kamin Mukaz D; Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
  • Lackland D; Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Muntner P; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Jackson EA; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. eajackson@uabmc.edu.
J Hum Hypertens ; 37(12): 1112-1118, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37407675
ABSTRACT
Higher rates of cardiovascular events have been observed among rural residents compared with urban. Hypertension and lack of blood pressure (BP) control are risk factors for cardiovascular events. We compared the prevalence of hypertension and controlled BP, and the distribution of systolic blood pressure (SBP), by urban-rural residence. Participants from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study, a prospective cohort of Black and White adults aged ≥45 years, were categorized as either urban, large rural, or small-isolated rural, by using the Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) categorization B system. Oucomes were hypertension prevalence (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg or antihypertensive use), BP control (BP < 140/90 among participants on antihypertensive medication), and the distribution of SBP. Counfounders were age, race, sex, antihypertensive medication use, and US Census Bureau division. The analysis included 26,133 participants (80.3% urban, 11.6% large-rural, 8.2% small-isolated rural). The unadjusted prevalence of hypertension was not different between groups. However, after adjustment, the odds of hypertension was higher among participants in the large rural group (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.27) and small-isolated rural group (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.30), compared with the urban group. There was no evidence of an adjusted difference in BP control for those taking antihypertensive medications. Adjusted differences in SBP were greater for both rural groups, compared with urban, at the higher percentiles of SBP. Rural residence was associated with a higher adjusted odds of hypertension and higher SBP.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Hypertens Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Hypertens Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...