Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) Postprocessing Protocols on Detection of Monosodium Urate (MSU) Deposits in Foot Tendons of Cadavers.
Klauser, Andrea Sabine; Strobl, Sylvia; Schwabl, Christoph; Kremser, Christian; Klotz, Werner; Vasilevska Nikodinovska, Violeta; Stofferin, Hannes; Scharll, Yannick; Halpern, Ethan.
Afiliação
  • Klauser AS; Department for Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Strobl S; Department for Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Schwabl C; Department for Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Kremser C; Department for Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Klotz W; Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Vasilevska Nikodinovska V; University Surgical Clinic "St. Naum Ohridski", Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.
  • Stofferin H; Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Scharll Y; Department for Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Halpern E; Jefferson Prostate Diagnostic and Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiology and Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(13)2023 Jun 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37443602
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate two different dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) post-processing protocols for the detection of MSU deposits in foot tendons of cadavers with verification by polarizing light microscopy as the gold standard. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A total of 40 embalmed cadavers (15 male; 25 female; median age, 82 years; mean, 80 years; range, 52-99; SD ± 10.9) underwent DECT to assess MSU deposits in foot tendons. Two postprocessing DECT protocols with different Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds, 150/500 (=established) versus 120/500 (=modified). HU were applied to dual source acquisition with 80 kV for tube A and 140 kV for tube B. Six fresh cadavers (4 male; 2 female; median age, 78; mean, 78.5; range 61-95) were examined by DECT. Tendon dissection of 2/6 fresh cadavers with positive DECT 120 and negative DECT 150 studies were used to verify MSU deposits by polarizing light microscopy.

RESULTS:

The tibialis anterior tendon was found positive in 57.5%/100% (DECT 150/120), the peroneus tendon in 35%/100%, the achilles tendon in 25%/90%, the flexor halluces longus tendon in 10%/100%, and the tibialis posterior tendon in 12.5%/97.5%. DECT 120 resulted in increased tendon MSU deposit detection, when DECT 150 was negative, with an overall agreement between DECT 150 and DECT 120 of 80% (p = 0.013). Polarizing light microscope confirmed MSU deposits detected only by DECT 120 in the tibialis anterior, the achilles, the flexor halluces longus, and the peroneal tendons.

CONCLUSION:

The DECT 120 protocol showed a higher sensitivity when compared to DECT 150.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria