Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled trial.
Chandran K R, Segin; Goyal, Manoj; Mittal, Neeti; George, Jensy Sara.
Afiliação
  • Chandran K R S; Santosh University, No.1, Santosh Nagar, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201009, India. Electronic address: seginchandran@gmail.com.
  • Goyal M; Santosh University, No.1, Santosh Nagar, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201009, India.
  • Mittal N; Santosh University, No.1, Santosh Nagar, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201009, India.
  • George JS; The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University 69, Anna Salai, Rd, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600032, India.
J Dent ; 136: 104620, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454788
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the accuracy of immediate implant placement with freehand and static guided surgery.

METHODS:

An RCT was conducted on 61 subjects who received a total of 80 dental implants. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to two groups freehand surgery (control group, n = 40 implants) and static guided surgery with R2Gate® (Megagen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea, test group, n = 40 implants). Crestal and apical deviations in both mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions, as well as depth and angular deviations, were calculated by comparing the three-dimensional (3D) position of the implant in the planning software with the final implant position, revealed by an intraoral scan of the fixture after placement. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparative assessment.

RESULTS:

In the freehand group (control), crestal deviations of 1.13 ± 0.89 mm and 1.00 ± 0.76 mm were found in the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions, respectively, versus 0.34 ± 0.26 mm (p<0.001) and 0.37 ± 0.24 mm (p = 0.03) in the static guided surgery group (test). Apical deviation was also higher in the freehand group (control) than in the static guided surgery group (test) in the mesiodistal (4.04 ± 1.90 mm vs. 0.97 ± 0.55 mm, p = 0.04) and buccolingual directions (3.46 ± 1.82 mm vs. 0.94 ± 0.67 mm, p = 0.02). Freehand surgery had greater angular deviation (6.09° ± 3.23) compared to guided surgery (0.83° ± 0.53, p = 0.02). However, depth deviation was similar in the freehand surgery group (2.24 ± 1.58 mm) and static guided surgery group (0.66 ± 0.43, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS:

Immediate implant placement with static guided surgery demonstrated better accuracy than freehand surgery. STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE Guided implant surgery showed fewer deviations compared to freehand surgery in fresh extraction sockets; therefore, the use of static guides should be given preference over the freehand modality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article