Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preemptive immune globulin therapy in sensitized lung transplant recipients.
Goldsby, Jessica; Beermann, Kristi; Frankel, Courtney; Parish, Alice; Stauffer, Nicolas; Schandert, Amanda; Erkanli, Alaattin; Reynolds, John M.
Afiliação
  • Goldsby J; Department of Pharmacy, Duke Health, DUHS Box 3089, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • Beermann K; Department of Pharmacy, Duke Health, DUHS Box 3089, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: Kristi.beermann@duke.edu.
  • Frankel C; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke Health, 330 Trent Drive, Box 102352, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • Parish A; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102, Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • Stauffer N; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102, Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • Schandert A; Department of Pharmacy, Duke Health, DUHS Box 3089, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • Erkanli A; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102, Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • Reynolds JM; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke Health, 330 Trent Drive, Box 102352, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Transpl Immunol ; 80: 101904, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37499884
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sensitized lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies, which have been associated with acute and chronic rejection. Perioperative intravenous immune globulin has been used in sensitized individuals to down-regulate antibody production.

METHODS:

We compared patients with a pre-transplant calculated panel reactive antibody ≥25% who did not receive preemptive immune globulin therapy to a historical control that received preemptive immune globulin therapy. Our cohort included 59 patients, 17 patients did not receive immune globulin therapy and 42 patients received therapy.

RESULTS:

Donor specific antibody development was numerically higher in the non-immune globulin group compared to the immune globulin group (58.8% vs 33.3%, respectively, odds ratio 2.80, 95% confidence interval [0.77, 10.79], p = 0.13). Median time to antibody development was 9 days (Q1, Q3 7, 19) and 28 days (Q1, Q3 7, 58) in the non-immune globulin and immune globulin groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 12 months.

CONCLUSION:

These findings are hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for larger, randomized studies to determine association of immune globulin therapy with clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Immunol Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Immunol Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos