Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative study on the short-term clinical outcomes of Da Vinci SP versus Da Vinci Xi for rectal cancer surgery.
Alshalawi, Wed; Lee, Chul Seung; Kim, Byung Chul; Han, Seung Rim; Kim, In Kyeong; Bae, Jung Hoon; Lee, In Kyu; Lee, Dosang; Lee, Yoon Suk.
Afiliação
  • Alshalawi W; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia.
  • Lee CS; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hansol Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim BC; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Han SR; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ain Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim IK; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Bae JH; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee IK; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee D; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee YS; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Int J Med Robot ; : e2558, 2023 Jul 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37503881
PURPOSE: The Da Vinci SP robot system was recently introduced, but its safety and feasibility for rectal cancer compared with the currently used robot system have not been reported. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study. Data from patients who underwent abdominal total mesorectal excision (TME) from October 2015 to October 2022 were analysed. After propensity score matching, the short-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patient data were analysed. Intersphincteric resection was more common in the SP group (7 cases (25%) vs. 0 case (0%), p = 0.001). The operation time was significantly shorter in SP (184 vs. 227.5 min, p < 0.0001), but the docking time was similar. The postoperative complications were similar. There were no differences in the postoperative pain score and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The SP robotic system for abdominal TME has acceptable short-term and is safe and technically feasible.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Med Robot Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Med Robot Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido