Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of forest management choices on carbon sequestration and biodiversity at national scale.
Mäkelä, Annikki; Minunno, Francesco; Kujala, Heini; Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa; Heikkinen, Risto K; Junttila, Virpi; Peltoniemi, Mikko; Forsius, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Mäkelä A; Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) & Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Minunno F; Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) & Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kujala H; Finnish Natural History Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kosenius AK; Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Heikkinen RK; Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Junttila V; Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Peltoniemi M; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
  • Forsius M; Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland.
Ambio ; 52(11): 1737-1756, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535310
ABSTRACT
Forest management methods and harvest intensities influence wood production, carbon sequestration and biodiversity. We devised different management scenarios by means of stakeholder analysis and incorporated them in the forest growth simulator PREBAS. To analyse impacts of harvest intensity, we used constraints on total harvest business as usual, low harvest, intensive harvest and no harvest. We carried out simulations on a wall-to-wall grid in Finland until 2050. Our objectives were to (1) test how the management scenarios differed in their projections, (2) analyse the potential wood production, carbon sequestration and biodiversity under the different harvest levels, and (3) compare different options of allocating the scenarios and protected areas. Harvest level was key to carbon stocks and fluxes regardless of management actions and moderate changes in proportion of strictly protected forest. In contrast, biodiversity was more dependent on other management variables than harvesting levels, and relatively independent of carbon stocks and fluxes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ambio Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ambio Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia