Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Readiness for interprofessional learning among health science students: a cross-sectional Q-methodology and likert-based study.
Oliveira, Ana; Brewer-Deluce, Danielle; Akhtar-Danesh, Noori; Wojkowski, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Oliveira A; Program for Interprofessional Practice, Education and Research (PIPER), McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, 647-765- 1525, Canada. araujoda@mcmaster.ca.
  • Brewer-Deluce D; Respiratory Medicine, West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Canada. araujoda@mcmaster.ca.
  • Akhtar-Danesh N; Lab3R - Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Aveiro, Portugal. araujoda@mcmaster.ca.
  • Wojkowski S; Department of Medical Sciences, iBiMED - Institute of Biomedicine, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. araujoda@mcmaster.ca.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 583, 2023 Aug 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37596571
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Interprofessional education (IPE) prepares healthcare students for collaboration in clinical practice, but the effectiveness of this teaching method depends on students' readiness for and perceptions of IPE. Evaluating students' readiness for and perceptions of IPE is challenging, due to the lack of comprehensive measures. This study characterized the level of IPE readiness and perspectives across first-year undergraduate and graduate health science students using the readiness for interprofessional learning Likert Scale (RIPLS) and Q-methodologies.

METHODS:

This is a cross-sectional, online study. Students were randomized to answer the Likert-scale version of RIPLS (80%) or a matched Q-methodology survey (20%). An ANCOVA compared RIPLS scores between students from different program levels (graduate/undergraduate) and specialization (health professional and general programs). The Q-data was analysed using a by-person factor analysis.

RESULTS:

Three hundred and four (33% response rate) and 71 (30% response rate) students completed the Likert scale and the Q-methodology surveys, respectively. Students from graduate programs demonstrated high readiness for IPE (higher total RIPLS scores p < 0.001) in comparison to undergraduates. Three factors, associated with program specialization (p = 0.04), emerged from the Q-methodology analysis characterizing students learning priorities. Students in undergraduate general programs were focused on IPE relevance and benefits to "the clinical team", students in graduate programs focused on "the patient", and those in undergraduate health professional programs focused on themselves ("me").

CONCLUSIONS:

This novel mixed-methods approach combining traditional Likert-scales with Q-methodology elucidated not only associations between program and specialization with readiness (Likert) but also which components of IPE were valued the most (Q-methodology) and by whom.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes / Aprendizagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes / Aprendizagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá