Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multiplex digital PCR: a superior technique to qPCR for the simultaneous detection of duck Tembusu virus, duck circovirus, and new duck reovirus.
Yin, Yanwen; Xiong, Chenyong; Shi, Kaichuang; Long, Feng; Feng, Shuping; Qu, Sujie; Lu, Wenjun; Huang, Meizhi; Lin, Changhua; Sun, Wenchao; Li, Zongqiang.
Afiliação
  • Yin Y; Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Xiong C; College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
  • Shi K; Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Long F; Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Feng S; Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Qu S; Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Lu W; Guangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Huang M; Longan Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
  • Lin C; College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
  • Sun W; Guangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Xijiang Co., Ltd., Guigang, China.
  • Li Z; Wenzhou Key Laboratory for Virology and Immunology, Institute of Virology, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China.
Front Vet Sci ; 10: 1222789, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37662994
ABSTRACT
Duck Tembusu virus (DTMUV), duck circovirus (DuCV), and new duck reovirus (NDRV) have seriously hindered the development of the poultry industry in China. To detect the three pathogens simultaneously, a multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) was developed and compared with multiplex qPCR in this study. The multiplex dPCR was able to specifically detect DTMUV, DuCV, and NDRV but not amplify Muscovy duck reovirus (MDRV), Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), goose parvovirus (GPV), H4 avian influenza virus (H4 AIV), H6 avian influenza virus (H6 AIV), and Newcastle disease virus (NDV). The standard curves showed excellent linearity in multiplex dPCR and qPCR and were positively correlated. The sensitivity results showed that the lowest detection limit of multiplex dPCR was 1.3 copies/µL, which was 10 times higher than that of multiplex qPCR. The reproducibility results showed that the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 0.06-1.94%. A total of 173 clinical samples were tested to assess the usefulness of the method; the positive detection rates for DTMUV, DuCV, and NDRV were 18.5, 29.5, and 14.5%, respectively, which were approximately 4% higher than those of multiplex qPCR, and the kappa values for the clinical detection results of multiplex dPCR and qPCR were 0.85, 0.89, and 0.86, indicating that the two methods were in excellent agreement.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Vet Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Vet Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China