A disanalogy with RCTs and its implications for second-generation causal knowledge.
Behav Brain Sci
; 46: e194, 2023 09 11.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37694935
ABSTRACT
We are less optimistic than Madole & Harden that family-based genome-wide association studies (GWASs) will lead to significant second-generation causal knowledge. Despite bearing some similarities, family-based GWASs and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are not identical. Most RCTs assess a relatively homogenous causal stimulus as a treatment, whereas GWASs assess highly heterogeneous causal stimuli. Thus, GWAS results will not translate so easily into second-generation causal knowledge.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Conhecimento
/
Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Behav Brain Sci
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article