Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound scan in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis.
Erem, Geoffrey; Otike, Caroline; Okuja, Maxwell; Ameda, Faith; Nalyweyiso, Dorothy Irene; Mubuuke, Aloysius Gonzaga; Kakinda, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Erem G; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Otike C; Department of Radiology, St Francis Hospital Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Okuja M; Directorate of Clinical Services, Joint Clinical Research Center, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Ameda F; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Nalyweyiso DI; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Mubuuke AG; Department of Radiology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Kakinda M; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0287621, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37729384
ABSTRACT
Chest Ultrasound Scan (CUS) has been utilized in place of CXR in the diagnosis of adult pneumonia with similar or higher sensitivity and specificity to CXR. However, there is a paucity of data on the use of CUS for the diagnosis of childhood TB. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CUS for childhood TB. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda. Eighty children up to 14 years of age with presumptive TB were enrolled. They all had CUS and CXR performed and interpreted independently by radiologists. The radiologist who performed the CXR was blinded to the CUS findings, and vice versa. Radiologists noted whether TB was likely or unlikely. A two-by-two table was developed to compare the absolute number of children as either TB likely or TB unlikely on CXR or CUS. This was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of CUS when screening for TB in children, with a correction to accommodate the use of CXR as a reference test. The sensitivity of CUS was 64% (95% CI 48.5%-77.3%), while its specificity was 42.7% (95% CI 25.5%-60.8%). Both the CUS and CXR found 29 children with a likelihood of TB, and 27 children unlikely to have TB. CUS met the sensitivity target set by the WHO TPP for Triage, and it had a sensitivity and specificity comparable to that of CXR.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose / Hospitais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Uganda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose / Hospitais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Uganda