Total-body Dynamic Imaging and Kinetic Modeling of 18F-AraG in Healthy Individuals and a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Undergoing Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy.

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapies, especially the checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 antibodies, have transformed cancer treatment by enhancing immune system's capability to target and kill cancer cells. However, predicting immunotherapy response remains challenging. 18F-AraG is a molecular imaging tracer targeting activated T cells, which may facilitate therapy response assessment by non-invasive quantification of immune cell activity within tumor microenvironment and elsewhere in the body. The aim of this study was to obtain preliminary data on total-body pharmacokinetics of 18F-AraG, as a potential quantitative biomarker for immune response evaluation. Methods: The study consisted of 90-min total-body dynamic scans of four healthy subjects and one non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient, scanned before and after anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Compartmental modeling with Akaike information criterion model selection were employed to analyze tracer kinetics in various organs. Additionally, seven sub-regions of the primary lung tumor and four mediastinal lymph nodes were analyzed. Practical identifiability analysis was performed to assess reliability of kinetic parameter estimation. Correlations of SUVmean, SUVR (tissue-to-blood ratio), and Logan plot slope KLogan with total volume-of-distribution VT were calculated to identify potential surrogates for kinetic modeling. Results: Strong correlations were observed between KLogan and SUVR values with VT, suggesting that they can be used as promising surrogates for VT, especially in organs with low blood-volume fraction. Moreover, the practical identifiability analysis suggests that the dynamic 18F-AraG PET scans could potentially be shortened to 60 minutes, while maintaining quantification accuracy for all organs-of-interest. The study suggests that although 18F-AraG SUV images can provide insights on immune cell distribution, kinetic modeling or graphical analysis methods may be required for accurate quantification of immune response post-therapy. While SUVmean showed variable changes in different sub-regions of the tumor post-therapy, the SUVR, KLogan, and VT showed consistent increasing trends in all analyzed sub-regions of the tumor with high practical identifiability. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the promise of 18F-AraG dynamic imaging as a non-invasive biomarker for quantifying the immune response to immunotherapy in cancer patients. The promising total-body kinetic modeling results also suggest potentially wider applications of the tracer in investigating the role of T cells in the immunopathogenesis of diseases.