Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inter-observer variation of target volume delineation for CT-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Elmali, Aysenur; Biltekin, Fatih; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Gultekin, Melis; Yuce, Deniz; Yildiz, Ferah.
Afiliação
  • Elmali A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Biltekin F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Sari SY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gultekin M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yuce D; Department of Preventive Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yildiz F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Contemp Brachytherapy ; 15(4): 253-260, 2023 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37799120
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Delineation is a critical and challenging step in radiotherapy planning. Differences in delineation among observers are common, despite the presence of contouring guidelines. This study aimed to identify the inter-observer variability in the target volume delineation of computed tomography (CT)-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Material and

methods:

Four radiation oncologists (ROs) with different expertise levels delineated high-risk (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) clinical target volume (CTV) according to GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations, in a blinded manner on every CT set of ten locally advanced cervical cancer cases. The most experienced RO's contours were determined as the index and used for comparison. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and pairwise Hausdorff distance (HD) metrics were applied to compare the overlap and gross deviations of all contours.

Results:

Median DSC for HR-CTV and IR-CTV were 0.73 and 0.76, respectively, and a good concordance was achieved for both in majority of contours. While there was no difference in DSC measurements for HR-CTV among the three ROs, RO-3 provided improved DSC values for IR-CTV (p = 0.01). Median HD95 was 5.02 mm and 6.83 mm, and median HDave was 1.69 mm and 2.21 mm for HR-CTV and IR-CTV, respectively. There was no significant difference among ROs in HR-CTV for HD95 or HDave; however, IR-CTV value was significantly improved according to RO-3 (p = 0.01). Case-by-case HD analysis showed no significant inter-observer variations, except for two cases.

Conclusions:

The inter-observer agreement is generally high for target volumes in CT-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. The agreement is lower for IR-CTV than HR-CTV. The individual characteristics of each case and different expertise levels of the ROs may have caused the differences. Despite the good concordance for delineation, dosimetric consequences can still be clinically significant.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Brachytherapy Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Brachytherapy Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia