Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Strategies for Surgically Resectable Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Urinary Tract.
Alhalabi, Omar; Wilson, Nathaniel; Xiao, Lianchun; Lin, Yiyun; Khandelwal, Jaanki; Moussa, Mohammad Jad; Msaouel, Pavlos; Navai, Neema; Gao, Jianjun; Kamat, Ashish M; Pilie, Patrick; Shah, Amishi Y; Goswami, Sangeeta; Matin, Surena; Kovitz, Craig; Holla, Vijaykumar; Guo, Charles; Czerniak, Bogdan; Logothetis, Christopher; Corn, Paul G; Dinney, Colin P N; Campbell, Matthew T; Hansel, Donna E; Tannir, Nizar M; Siefker-Radtke, Arlene O.
Afiliação
  • Alhalabi O; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: oalhalabi@mdanderson.org.
  • Wilson N; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Xiao L; Department of Statistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lin Y; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Khandelwal J; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Moussa MJ; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Msaouel P; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; David H. Koch Center for Applied Research
  • Navai N; Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gao J; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Kamat AM; Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Pilie P; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Shah AY; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Goswami S; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Matin S; Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Kovitz C; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Holla V; Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Guo C; Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Czerniak B; Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Logothetis C; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Corn PG; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Dinney CPN; Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Campbell MT; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hansel DE; Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Tannir NM; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Siefker-Radtke AO; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: asiefker@mdanderson.org.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 6(6): 611-620, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37833193
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) has been recommended as the optimal strategy in surgically resectable neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the urinary tract (NEC-URO).

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the systemic therapy regimen and timing, which are most active against NEC-URO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

We used our institutional historical clinical and pathological database to study 203 patients (cT2, 74%; cT3/4a, 22%; and cTx, 4%) with surgically resectable NEC-URO between November 1985 and May 2020. A total of 141 patients received neoCTX and 62 underwent initial radical surgery, 24 of whom received adjuvant CTX (adjCTX). INTERVENTION Neoadjuvant CTX with etoposide/cisplatin (EP), an alternating doublet of ifosfamide/doxorubicin (IA) and EP, dose-dense methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC), gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), or others. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

Overall survival (OS), downstaging rate, and pathological complete response using a multivariable model adjusting for tumor- and patient-related factors. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

Downstaging rate was significantly improved with neoCTX versus initial surgery (49.6% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001), stage cT2N0 versus cT3/4N0 (44% vs 25%, p = 0.01), or presence of carcinoma in situ (47% vs 28%, p = 0.01). Downstaging was greatest with IA/EP (65%) versus EP (39%), MVAC/GC (27%), or others (36%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, IA/EP was still associated with improved downstaging (odds ratio = 3.7 [1.3-10.2], p = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 59.7 mo, 5-yr OS rates for neoCTX followed by surgery, surgery alone, and surgery followed by adjCTX were 57%, 22%, and 30%, respectively. An NEC regimen (IA/EP or EP) versus a urothelial regimen (MVAC/GC or others) was associated with improved survival (145.4 vs 42.5 mo, hazard ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS:

Neoadjuvant CTX remains the standard-of-care treatment for NEC-URO with an advantage for NEC regimens over traditional urothelial regimens. IA/EP improves pathological downstaging at the time of surgery compared with EP, but is reserved for younger and higher function patients. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

In this report, we looked at the outcomes from invasive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract in a large US population. We found that the outcomes varied with treatment strategy. We conclude that the best outcomes are seen in patients treated with chemotherapy prior to surgery and regimens tailored to histology and tolerance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema Urinário / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma Neuroendócrino Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema Urinário / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma Neuroendócrino Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article