Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biophysical characterization of the tennis serve: A systematic scoping review with evidence gap map.
Brito, André V; Afonso, José; Silva, Gonçalo; Fernandez-Fernandez, Jaime; Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Afiliação
  • Brito AV; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI(2)D) and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/AndreVilela1996.
  • Afonso J; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI(2)D) and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal.
  • Silva G; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI(2)D) and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal.
  • Fernandez-Fernandez J; Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain; AMRED, Human Movement and Sports Performance Analysis, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain.
  • Fernandes RJ; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI(2)D) and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: ricfer@fade.up.pt.
J Sci Med Sport ; 27(2): 125-140, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37980182
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to assess the available evidence on the biophysics of the tennis serve, mapping the populations, interventions, contexts and other relevant information to highlight what is already known and to identify gaps in the literature.

DESIGN:

Systematic scoping review with evidence gap map.

METHODS:

The protocol was designed according to PRISMA 2020, Prisma-ScR guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. The searches were conducted on July 20, 2022 and updated on April 1, 2023, in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (core collection). The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochranes method for nonrandomized studies (RoBANS) and a narrative synthesis of the main findings was performed and supplemented with an evidence gap map.

RESULTS:

Most trials were found on serve kinematics and kinetics (95 %), analyzing only flat serves (84 and 72 %, respectively). Few trials focused on physiology (20 %; e.g. biomarkers), under-19, left or both-handed, female and intermediate beginner or starter players (29, 17, 8 and 7 %, respectively). We found a preponderance of low and unclear risk of bias (63 and 31 %, respectively) and only 7 % high, particularly, on the assessment of confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current scoping review reveals a few trials on physiological rather than biomechanical variables, as well as the absence of the kick and slice serve, foot-back and foot-up serve, and left-handed, female, and young player analyses. We did not find systematic mistakes or limitations in the design, conduct, or analysis that would distort the results, since only 7 % presented a high risk of bias.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tênis Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Sci Med Sport Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tênis Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Sci Med Sport Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article