Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High efficiency single-catheter workflow for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation in the QDOT catheter era.
Valeriano, Chiara; Buytaert, Dimitri; Fabbricatore, Davide; De Schouwer, Koen; Addeo, Lucio; De Braekeleer, Lisa; Geelen, Peter; De Potter, Tom.
Afiliação
  • Valeriano C; Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Arrhythmia Unit, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Buytaert D; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Fabbricatore D; Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Arrhythmia Unit, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • De Schouwer K; Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Arrhythmia Unit, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Addeo L; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • De Braekeleer L; Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Arrhythmia Unit, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Geelen P; Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Arrhythmia Unit, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • De Potter T; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092999
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation may improve the consistency and efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The novel QDOT Micro™ catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc.) with temperature feedback and microelectrodes aims to enhance PVI efficiency and safety. This study wants to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of a standardized single-catheter workflow for PVI using QDOT (Q-FLOW).

METHODS:

The Q-FLOW includes single transeptal access, radiofrequency encircling of the PVs using a power of 50 W in a temperature/flow-controlled mode, and validation of the circles with microelectrodes. A 11 propensity-matched cohort of patients treated with conventional power-controlled ablation using a circular mapping catheter (CMC-FLOW) was used to compare procedural and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 150 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients (paroxysmal 67%, persistent 33%) were included. First-pass isolation rate was 86%. Procedural time, X-ray time, and dose were significantly lower for the Q-FLOW vs the CMC-FLOW (67.2 ± 17.9 vs 88.3 ± 19.2 min, P < 0.001; 3.0 ± 1.9 vs 5.0 ± 2.4 min, P < 0.001; 4.3 ± 1.9 vs 6.4 ± 2.3 Gycm2, P < 0.001). Complications were numerically but not significantly lower in the Q-FLOW group (2 [1.3%] vs 7 [4.7%], P = 0.091). There was no difference in arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months (atrial arrhythmia-free survival rate, 87.5% vs 84.4%, P = 0.565).

CONCLUSION:

A streamlined single-catheter workflow for PVI using QDOT was feasible and safe, resulting in a high rate of first-pass isolation and a low complication rate. The Q-FLOW further improved the efficiency of PVI compared to the standard CMC-FLOW, without difference in the 12-month outcome.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica
...