Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do glycaemic treatment targets affect the perinatal mental health status of women with gestational diabetes? - Data from the TARGET Trial.
Ohene-Agyei, Phyllis; Tran, Thach; Harding, Jane E; Crowther, Caroline A.
Afiliação
  • Ohene-Agyei P; Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Tran T; School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Harding JE; Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Crowther CA; Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. c.crowther@auckland.ac.nz.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 869, 2023 Dec 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104076
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with perinatal mental disorders. Effective management may reduce this risk, but there is little evidence on effects of different glycaemic treatment targets. We assessed whether tight glycaemic treatment targets compared with less-tight targets reduce the risk of poor mental health outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.

METHODS:

This was a secondary analysis of data from women who consented to complete perinatal mental health questionnaires as participants in the TARGET Trial, a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in 10 hospitals in New Zealand. All hospitals initially used less tight glycaemic targets for management of gestational diabetes and were sequentially randomized, in clusters of two at 4-monthly intervals, to using tighter glycaemic targets. Data were collected from 414 participants on anxiety (6-item Spielberger State Anxiety scale), depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), and health-related quality of life (36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey) at the time of diagnosis (baseline), 36 weeks of gestation, and 6 months postpartum. The primary outcome was composite poor mental health (any of anxiety, vulnerability to depression, or poor mental health-related quality of life). Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine the main treatment effect with 95% confidence intervals using an intention-to-treat approach.

RESULTS:

We found no differences between randomised glycaemic target groups in the primary outcome at 36 weeks' (relative risk (RR) 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.58, 1.95) and 6 months postpartum (RR 1.03; 0.58, 1.81). There were similarly no differences in the components of the primary outcome at 36 weeks' [anxiety (RR 0.85; 0.44, 1.62), vulnerability to depression (RR 1.10; 0.43, 2.83), or poor mental health-related quality of life (RR 1.05; 0.50, 2.20)] or at 6 months postpartum [anxiety (RR1.21; 0.59, 2.48), vulnerability to depression (RR1.41; 0.53, 3.79), poor mental health-related quality of life (RR 1.11; 0.59, 2.08)].

CONCLUSION:

We found no evidence that adoption of tighter glycaemic treatment targets in women with gestational diabetes alters their mental health status at 36 weeks' gestation and at 6 months postpartum. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). ACTRN12615000282583 (ANZCTR-Registration). Date of registration 25 March 2015.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia País de publicação: Reino Unido