Added-value of 3D amide proton transfer MRI in assessing prognostic factors of cervical cancer: a comparative study with multiple model diffusion-weighted imaging.

ABSTRACT

Background: Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging has been gradually applied to cervical cancer, yet the relationships between APT and multiple model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have yet to be investigated. This study attempted to evaluate the added value of 3-dimensional (3D) APT imaging to multiple model DWI for assessing prognostic factors of cervical cancer. Methods: This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. A total of 88 consecutive patients with cervical cancer underwent APT imaging and DWI with 11 b-values (0-2,000 s/mm2). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion (D), perfusion fraction (f), pseudo-diffusion (D*), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated based on mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and kurtosis models. The mean, minimum, and maximum values of APT signal intensity (APT SI) and DWI-derived metrics were compared based on tumor stages, subtypes, grades, and lymphovascular space invasion status by Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. Results: APT SImax, APT SImin, MKmean, and MKmax showed significant differences between adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (all P<0.05). APT SImean, APT SImax, and MKmax were higher and ADCmin, Dmean, Dmin, and MDmin were lower in the high-grade tumor than in low-grade tumor (all P<0.05). For distinguishing lymphovascular space invasion, only MKmean showed significant difference (P=0.010). APT SImax [odds ratio (OR) =2.347, P=0.029], APT SImin (OR =0.352; P=0.024), and MKmean (OR =6.523; P=0.001) were the independent predictors for tumor subtype, and APT SImax (OR =2.885; P=0.044), MDmin (OR =0.155, P=0.012) were the independent predictors for histological grade of cervical cancer. When APT SImin and APT SImax was combined with MKmean and MKmax, the diagnostic performance was significantly improved for differentiating AC and AC [area under the curve (AUC) 0.908, sensitivity 87.5%; specificity 83.3%; P<0.001]. The combination of APT SImean, APT SImax, ADCmin, MKmax, and MDmin demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for predicting tumor grade (AUC 0.903, sensitivity 78.6%; specificity 88.9%; P<0.001). Conclusions: Addition of APT to DWI may improve the ability to noninvasively predict poor prognostic factors of cervical cancer.