Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis.
Batista, Sávio; Oliveira, Leonardo de Barros; Sousa, Marcelo Porto; Pinheiro, Agostinho C; Borges, Jordana; Santana, Laís; Bertani, Raphael; Andreão, Filipi Fim; Simões, Adria; Almeida Filho, José Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Batista S; Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Oliveira LB; Faculty of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
  • Sousa MP; Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Pinheiro AC; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Borges J; Independent Researcher.
  • Santana L; Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Bertani R; Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Andreão FF; Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Simões A; Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Geral de Palmas, Tocantins, Brazil.
  • Almeida Filho JA; Department of Neurosurgery, Municipal Hospital Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Neuroradiol J ; 37(5): 546-555, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171509
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) through transradial access (TRA) is emerging as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, the current evidence base is limited, mainly comprising single-center studies.

OBJECTIVE:

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the safety and effectiveness of TRA for CAS, providing evidence to support clinical decisions.

METHODS:

We conducted searches on PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases, including studies on TRA for CAS. Studies with fewer than 20 patients, non-primary outcomes, and non-full-text articles were excluded.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 14 studies involving 1,166 patients who underwent CAS via TRA. Procedural success rate was high in 13 studies, with a 95% rate (95% CI; 92%-98%). Crossover to TFA access was observed in 12 studies at 6% (95% CI 3%-9%). Transradial access failure was reported in four studies, with a rate of 0% (95% CI 0%-0%). Cannulation failure resulted in a rate of 4% (95% CI 2%-7%). Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion (ARAO) occurred at a rate of 2% based on eight studies (95% CI 0%-5%). Forearm hematoma was reported in 10 studies, with an occurrence of 1% (95% CI 0%-2%). Cerebral vascular attacks (CAV) within 30 days were assessed in 13 studies, indicating a 2% occurrence (95% CI 1%-2%).

CONCLUSION:

The findings suggest that TRA for CAS yields promising outcomes with high success rates and low complication rates. Further research should focus on randomized controlled trials and long-term outcomes to validate and extend findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Artéria Radial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiol J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Artéria Radial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiol J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos