Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mini-AFTERc: a controlled pilot trial of a nurse-led psychological intervention for fear of breast cancer recurrence.
McHale, Calum; Cruickshank, Susanne; Brown, Tamara; Torrens, Claire; Armes, Jo; Fenlon, Deborah; Banks, Elspeth; Kelsey, Tom; Humphris, Gerald.
Afiliação
  • McHale C; Medical School, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK.
  • Cruickshank S; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Brown T; Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
  • Torrens C; NMAHP Research Unit, Stirling, UK.
  • Armes J; University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
  • Fenlon D; University of Swansea, Wales, UK.
  • Banks E; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, Carluke, Scotland, UK.
  • Kelsey T; Computer Science, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK.
  • Humphris G; Medical School, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK. gmh4@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Pilot Feasibility Stud ; 10(1): 3, 2024 Jan 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191445
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention.

DESIGN:

Non-randomised cluster-controlled pilot trial.

SETTING:

Four NHS out-patient breast cancer centres in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS:

Ninety-two women who had successfully completed primary treatment for breast cancer were screened for moderate levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Forty-five were eligible (17 intervention and 28 control) and 34 completed 3-month follow-up (15 intervention and 21 control). INTERVENTION Mini-AFTERc, a single brief (30 min) structured telephone discussion with a specialist breast cancer nurse (SBCN) trained to target the antecedents of FCR.

OUTCOMES:

Feasibility and acceptability of Mini-AFTERc and the study design were assessed via recruitment, consent, retention rates, patient outcomes (measured at baseline, 2, 4, and 12 weeks), and post-study interviews with participants and SBCNs, which were guided by Normalisation Process Theory.

RESULTS:

Mini-AFTERc was acceptable to patients and SBCNs. SBCNs believe the implementation of Mini-AFTERc to be feasible and an extension of discussions that already happen routinely. SBCNs believe delivery, however, at the scale required would be challenging given current competing demands for their time. Recruitment was impacted by variability in the follow-up practices of cancer centres and COVID-19 lockdown. Consent and follow-up procedures worked well, and retention rates were high.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study provided invaluable information about the potential challenges and solutions for testing the Mini-AFTERc intervention more widely where limiting high FCR levels is an important goal following recovery from primary breast cancer treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0376382 . Registered on 4 December 2018.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Pilot Feasibility Stud Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Pilot Feasibility Stud Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido