Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The importance of educational tools and a new software solution for visualizing and quantifying report correction in radiology training.
Salhöfer, Luca; Haubold, Johannes; Gutt, Maurice; Hosch, René; Umutlu, Lale; Meetschen, Mathias; Schuessler, Maximilian; Forsting, Michael; Nensa, Felix; Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael.
Afiliação
  • Salhöfer L; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. luca.salhoefer@uk-essen.de.
  • Haubold J; Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. luca.salhoefer@uk-essen.de.
  • Gutt M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
  • Hosch R; Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Umutlu L; Central IT Services, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Meetschen M; Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Schuessler M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
  • Forsting M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
  • Nensa F; Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Schaarschmidt BM; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 1172, 2024 01 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38216664
ABSTRACT
A novel software, DiffTool, was developed in-house to keep track of changes made by board-certified radiologists to preliminary reports created by residents and evaluate its impact on radiological hands-on training. Before (t0) and after (t2-4) the deployment of the software, 18 residents (median age 29 years; 33% female) completed a standardized questionnaire on professional training. At t2-4 the participants were also requested to respond to three additional questions to evaluate the software. Responses were recorded via a six-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly agree") to 6 ("strongly disagree"). Prior to the release of the software, 39% (7/18) of the residents strongly agreed with the statement that they manually tracked changes made by board-certified radiologists to each of their radiological reports while 61% were less inclined to agree with that statement. At t2-4, 61% (11/18) stated that they used DiffTool to track differences. Furthermore, we observed an increase from 33% (6/18) to 44% (8/18) of residents who agreed to the statement "I profit from every corrected report". The DiffTool was well accepted among residents with a regular user base of 72% (13/18), while 78% (14/18) considered it a relevant improvement to their training. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of providing a time-efficient way to analyze changes made to preliminary reports as an additive for professional training.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Reino Unido