Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Causal Effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Implementation on Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survival: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.
Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A; Weldeslase, Terhas Asfiha; Fasokun, Mojisola E; Odusanya, Eunice; Mejulu, Eunice O; Salihu, Ejura Y; Akueme, Ngozi T; Hughes, Kakra; Micheal, Miriam.
Afiliação
  • Akinyemi OA; Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, USA.
  • Weldeslase TA; Surgery, Howard University, Washington DC, USA.
  • Fasokun ME; Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, USA.
  • Odusanya E; Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
  • Mejulu EO; Obstetrics and Gynecology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
  • Salihu EY; Medical School, Western Illinois University, Illinois, USA.
  • Akueme NT; Department of Health Services Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
  • Hughes K; Dermatology, University of Medical Sciences (UNIMED), Ondo State, NGA.
  • Micheal M; Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52571, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38249651
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) accounts for a substantial number of cancer cases in the United States, with a significant prevalence and mortality rate. The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has the potential to impact cancer-specific survival among NHL patients by improving access to healthcare services and treatments.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to assess the impact of the implementation of the ACA on cancer-specific survival among patients diagnosed with NHL.

METHODOLOGY:

In this retrospective analysis, we leveraged data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to assess the impact of the ACA on cancer-specific survival among NHL patients. The study covered the years 2000-2020, divided into pre-ACA (2000-2013) and post-ACA (2017-2020) periods, with a three-year washout (2014-2016). Using a Difference-in-Differences approach, we compared Georgia (a non-expansion state) to New Jersey (an expansion state since 2014). We adjusted for patient demographics, income, metropolitan status, disease stage, and treatment modalities.

RESULTS:

Among 74,762 patients, 56.2% were in New Jersey (42,005), while 43.8% were in Georgia (32,757). The pre-ACA period included 32,851 patients (51.7% in Georgia and 56.7% in New Jersey), and 27,447 patients were in the post-ACA period (48.3% in Georgia and 43.4% in New Jersey). The post-ACA period exhibited a 34% survival improvement (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.75). ACA implementation was associated with a 16% survival boost among NHL patients in New Jersey (OR=0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95). Other factors linked to improved survival included surgery (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.91), radiotherapy (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82), and married status (OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.71).

CONCLUSION:

The study underscores the ACA's potential positive impact on cancer-specific survival among NHL patients, emphasizing the importance of healthcare policy interventions in improving patient outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos