Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers and facilitators of health professionals in adopting digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness: A systematic review.
Rodrigues, Daniela A; Roque, Maria; Mateos-Campos, Ramona; Figueiras, Adolfo; Herdeiro, Maria Teresa; Roque, Fátima.
Afiliação
  • Rodrigues DA; Research Laboratory on Epidemiology and Population Health, Polytechnic of Guarda (IPG), Guarda, Portugal.
  • Roque M; Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), Covilhã, Portugal.
  • Mateos-Campos R; University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Figueiras A; Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Herdeiro MT; Area of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Roque F; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076231225133, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250145
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Digital health is described as the use and development of all types of digital technologies to improve health outcomes. It could be used to prevent medication errors, a priority for health systems worldwide. However, the adoption of such tools remains slow. This study aims to identify factors (attitudes, knowledge and beliefs) acting as barriers and/or facilitators reported by healthcare professionals (HCPs) for the adoption of digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed by searching the literature in the MEDLINE PubMed, and EMBASE scientific databases for original articles regarding qualitative and quantitative data.

Results:

Fifteen articles were included and a total of 125 barriers and 108 facilitators were identified, consolidated and categorized into technical (n = 48), organizational (n = 12), economical (n = 4), user-related (n = 34), and patient-related (n = 8) components. The most often reported barriers and facilitators were technical component-related ones concerning the need for additional training (n = 6), the time consumed (n = 6), and the easy way of using or learning how to use the tools (n = 9), respectively. Regarding setting analysis, agreement with clinical decision recommendations and impact on the doctor-patient relationship were more valued in primary care, while the user interface and system design were in the hospital.

Conclusions:

The barriers and facilitators identified in this study provide relevant information to developers and it can be used as a starting point for the designing of successful digital health-related tools, specifically related to medication appropriateness. Future research includes economic evaluation-focused studies and in-depth case studies of specific barriers and facilitators.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal