Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How Does Oversewing/Suturing (OS/S) Compare to Other Staple Line Reinforcement Methods? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Diab, Abdul-Rahman F; Malaussena, Zachary; Ahmed, Abrahim; West, William; Docimo, Salvatore; Sujka, Joseph A; DuCoin, Christopher G.
Afiliação
  • Diab AF; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 5 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA. a.diab94@hotmail.com.
  • Malaussena Z; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
  • Ahmed A; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
  • West W; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
  • Docimo S; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 5 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
  • Sujka JA; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 5 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
  • DuCoin CG; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 5 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
Obes Surg ; 34(3): 985-996, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38261137
ABSTRACT
Various staple line reinforcement (SLR) techniques in sleeve gastrectomy, including oversewing/suturing (OS/S), gluing, and buttressing, have emerged to mitigate postoperative complications such as bleeding and leaks. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated OS/S as an efficacious strategy for preventing postoperative complications, encompassing leaks, bleeding, and reoperations. Given that OS/S is the sole SLR technique not incurring additional costs during surgery, our study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes associated with OS/S versus alternative SLR methods. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed the literature and conducted fifteen pairwise meta-analyses of comparative studies, each evaluating an outcome between OS/S and another SLR technique. Thirteen of these analyses showed no statistically significant differences, whereas two revealed notable distinctions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Obes Surg Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Obes Surg Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos