Maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with Fetal Pillow® use at full dilatation caesarean: A retrospective cohort.
BJOG
; 131(9): 1240-1248, 2024 Aug.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38287196
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate associations of the Fetal Pillow® with maternal and neonatal morbidity.DESIGN:
Retrospective cohort.SETTING:
Two tertiary maternity units, New Zealand. POPULATION OR SAMPLE Full dilatation singleton, term, cephalic caesarean section, with three comparisons at Unit A (1) before versus after introduction of the Fetal Pillow® (1 Jaunary 2016-31 October 2021); (2) with versus without the Fetal Pillow® after introduction (27 July 2017-31 October 2021); and (3) between Unit A and Unit B during the same time period (1 January 2019-31 October 2021). The Fetal Pillow® is unavailable at Unit B.METHODS:
Cases were ascertained and clinical data were extracted from electronic clinical databases and records. Outcome data were adjusted and presented as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% CI. MAIN OUTCOMEMEASURES:
Primary outcome "any" uterine incision extension; secondary outcomes included major extension (into adjacent structures), and a composite neonatal outcome.RESULTS:
In all, 1703 caesareans were included; 375 with the device and 1328 without. Uterine incision extension rates were at Unit A before versus afterintroduction:
26.8% versus 24.8% (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.19); at Unit A with the Fetal Pillow® versus without 26.1% versus 23.8% (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 0.83-1.57); and at Unit A versus Unit B 24.2% versus 29.2% (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99). No differences were found in major extensions, or neonatal composite outcome.CONCLUSIONS:
Despite the relatively large size of this study, it could not rule out either a positive or a negative association between use of the Fetal Pillow® and uterine extensions, major uterine incision extensions, and neonatal morbidity. Randomised controlled trial evidence is required to assess efficacy.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Cesárea
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Newborn
/
Pregnancy
País/Região como assunto:
Oceania
Idioma:
En
Revista:
BJOG
Assunto da revista:
GINECOLOGIA
/
OBSTETRICIA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Nova Zelândia
País de publicação:
Reino Unido