Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reason for euthanasia in dogs with urothelial carcinoma treated with chemotherapy or radiation therapy or both: A retrospective observational study.
McKenna, Charly; Poirier, Valerie J; Oblak, Michelle L; Nykamp, Stephanie; Mutsaers, Anthony J.
Afiliação
  • McKenna C; Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Poirier VJ; Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Oblak ML; Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Nykamp S; Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mutsaers AJ; Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
J Vet Intern Med ; 38(2): 1127-1134, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317542
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clients want to know the ultimate cause of death in their pet after cancer treatment. The cause of euthanasia and investigation of urinary obstruction in treated dogs with urothelial carcinoma (UC) has not been specifically reported in veterinary literature. HYPOTHESIS/

OBJECTIVES:

Our hypothesis was that the majority of treated dogs with UC are euthanized secondary to primary tumor factors, such as urinary obstruction. ANIMALS Fifty-nine client-owned dogs diagnosed with UC.

METHODS:

Retrospective observational study on clinical signs and disease at euthanasia of dogs with UC treated by radiation therapy or chemotherapy or both.

RESULTS:

The median overall survival time (OST) of all dogs was 339 days (range, 17-1996; 95% confidence interval [CI], 185-392; interquartile range [IQR], 112-505). Of dogs deemed to have been euthanized because of UC (50/59, 85%), the primary cause was considered to be local progression in 31/50 (62%), most often because of perceived complete or partial urinary obstruction (24/31, 77%). No variables were found to be predictive of urinary obstruction. The overall documented metastatic rate was 56%. In dogs euthanized because of UC, metastasis was deemed to be the cause in 19/50 (38%) dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Regardless of the type of treatment, UC in dogs has a poor prognosis and there is a continuing need to improve treatments that focus on local control of the primary tumor, given its high contribution to the decision for euthanasia. Proactive management to avoid the high frequency of urinary obstruction may be worthy of future investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Doenças do Cão Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Doenças do Cão Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá País de publicação: Estados Unidos