Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of vascular injuries on ICU patients: KZN experience.
Ntola, V C; Hardcastle, T C; Nkwanyana, N M.
Afiliação
  • Ntola VC; Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Electronic address: vuyolwe@yahoo.com.
  • Hardcastle TC; Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Trauma and Burns Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa.
  • Nkwanyana NM; School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Injury ; 55(5): 111418, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336574
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Vascular injury management remains an extremely challenging task. The fundamental principles of management are bleeding arrest and flow restoration, to avoid death and amputation. With advances in medicine, there has been a shift from ligation to primary repair which has resulted in a fall in amputation rate from 50 % in World War II to less than 2 % in civilian injuries.

METHOD:

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on ICU requiring polytrauma patients with vascular trauma admitted between January 2013 and December 2021. Additional data were collected prospectively from January 2022 to December 2022. All data was from an ethics approved Trauma Registry. The injury was either confirmed by imaging or via exploration. The pre-designed data proforma acquired the following variables age, mechanism of injury, injured vessel, associated injury, management of the vessel, and management of the associated injury. The data were analysed using Stata version 17 (StataCorp, College Station TX). Frequencies and percentages were calculated to summarise numerical data An ethical clearance was granted by the University of KwaZulu-Natal BREC (BREC 0004353/2022) and the KZN Department of Health. All data were de-identified in the data collection sheet.

RESULTS:

There were 154 arterial injuries and 39 venous injuries. The majority, 77 (50 %) of arterial injuries were managed via open strategies, and 36 (23 %) were managed via endovascular intervention. The majority, 20 (51 %) of venous injuries underwent open ligation, and 12 (31 %) were managed non-surgically. The highest number of endovascular interventions was observed in aortic injuries. For a total of 25 aortic injuries, 22 (83 %) were managed endovascular (TEVAR) and 2 (8 %) were managed non-operatively.

CONCLUSION:

The choice between the endovascular and open approach depends on the injured blood vessel. The majority of venous injuries were treated with open ligation in this cohort.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões do Sistema Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares / Ligadura Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Injury Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões do Sistema Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares / Ligadura Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Injury Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article