Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study.
Shen, Xing; Li, Fu Tao; Quan Cheng, Yong; Zheng, Ming Hui; Yao, Xin Qiang; Wang, Hai Ming; Ting Chen, Jian; Jiang, Hui.
Afiliação
  • Shen X; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li FT; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China.
  • Quan Cheng Y; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zheng MH; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yao XQ; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang HM; Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Ting Chen J; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China. chenjt@smu.edu.cn.
  • Jiang H; Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, China. jianghui@smu.edu.cn.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 142, 2024 Feb 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355528
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of a novel hand-held retractor system-assisted Wiltse TLIF with that P-TLIF and assess whether this hand-held retractor system assisted Wiltse TLIF can yield less paraspinal muscle injury.

METHODS:

56 patients (P-TLIF 26, Wiltse TLIF 30) were included in this one year prospective controlled study. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, mobilization time, and discharge time were recorded. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by ODI, VAS, JOA, and SF-36 scores (7 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery). Paraspinal muscle injury was assessed by postoperative MRI (6 months after surgery). CK and C-reaction protein were measured pre and postoperatively, and CT or X-ray (one year postoperatively) was used to assess bony union/non-union.

RESULTS:

The Wiltse (study) group was associated with significantly less estimated blood loss (79.67 ± 28.59 ml vs 192.31 ± 59.48 ml, P = 0.000*), postoperative drainage (43.33 ± 27.89 ml vs 285.57 ± 123.05 ml, P = 0.000*), and shorter mobilization (4.1 ± 1.2 d vs. 3.0 ± 0.9 d, P < 0.05) and discharge times (7.7 ± 1.9 d vs. 6.1 ± 1.2 d, P = 0.002*) than the P-TLIF (control) group. Serum CK activity at 24 h postoperatively in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (384.10 ± 141.99 U/L vs 532.76 ± 225.76 U/L, P = 0.018*). At 7 days after surgery, VAS (2.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.7, P = 0.000*)and ODI scores (43.9 ± 11.9 vs 55.2 ± 12.9, P = 0.001*) were lower, while the JOA scores (18.4 ± 3.4 vs 16.3 ± 4.2, P = 0.041*) was higher in the control group than in the study group. Results observed at 3 months of follow-up were consistent with those at 7 days. After six months postoperatively, paraspinal muscle degeneration in the control group was more significant than in the study group (P = 0.008*).

CONCLUSION:

Our study showed that this novel hand-held retractor system assisted Wiltse approach TLIF can significantly reduce paraspinal muscle injury, postoperative drainage, and intraoperative blood loss, mobilization and discharge time, as well as yield better short-term outcomes compared to P-TLIF. TRIAL REGISTRATION 25/09/2023 NCT06052579.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Reino Unido