Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frame-based versus robot-assisted stereo-electro-encephalography for drug-resistant epilepsy.
Han, Chang-Lin; Chou, Chien-Chen; Chen, Hsin-Hung; Chen, Yi-Hsiu; Lin, Chun-Fu; Chen, Chien; Yu, Hsiang-Yu; Chen, Yu-Wei; Lee, Cheng-Chia.
Afiliação
  • Han CL; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chou CC; Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen HH; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen YH; Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lin CF; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen C; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Yu HY; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen YW; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee CC; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 85, 2024 Feb 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361129
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an effective presurgical invasive evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsies. The introduction of robotic devices provides a simplified, accurate, and safe alternative to the conventional SEEG technique. We report our institutional experience with robot-assisted SEEG and compare its in vivo accuracy, operation efficiency, and safety with the more traditional SEEG workflow.

METHODS:

All patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy who underwent SEEG depth electrode implantation between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Technical advancements of the robot-assisted technique are described. Analyses of patient demographics, electrode implantation accuracy, operation time, and procedure-related complications were performed.

RESULTS:

One hundred and sixty-six patients underwent 167 SEEG procedures. The first 141 procedures were performed using a conventional approach involving a Leksell stereotactic system, and the last 26 procedures were robot-assisted. Among the 1726 depth electrodes that were inserted, the median entry point localization error was as follows conventional (1.0 mm; range, 0.1-33.5 mm) and robot-assisted (1.1 mm; range, 0-4.8 mm) (P = 0.17). The median target point localization error was as follows conventional (2.8 mm; range, 0.1-49 mm) and robot-assisted (1.8 mm; range, 0-30.3 mm) (P < 0.001). The median operation time was significantly reduced with the robot-assisted workflow (90 min vs. 77.5 min; P < 0.01). Total complication rates were as follows conventional (17.7%) and robot-assisted (11.5%) (P = 0.57). Major complication rates were 3.5% and 7.7% (P = 0.77), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

SEEG is a safe and highly accurate method that provides essential guidance for epilepsy surgery. Implementing SEEG in conjunction with multimodal planning systems and robotic devices can further increase safety margin, surgical efficiency, and accuracy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Epilepsia / Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan País de publicação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Epilepsia / Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan País de publicação: Áustria