Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The difference between dacomitinib and afatinib in effectiveness and safety in first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world observational study.
Cheng, Wen-Chien; Lin, Chi-Chien; Liao, Wei-Chih; Lin, Yu-Chao; Chen, Chia-Hung; Chen, Hung-Jen; Tu, Chih-Yen; Hsia, Te-Chun.
Afiliação
  • Cheng WC; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Lin CC; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Liao WC; Department of Life Science, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Lin YC; PhD Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chen CH; Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chen HJ; Institute of Biomedical Science, the iEGG and Animal Biotechnology Center, Advanced Plant and Food Crop Biotechnology Center, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan. lincc@email.nchu.edu.tw.
  • Tu CY; Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. lincc@email.nchu.edu.tw.
  • Hsia TC; Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. lincc@email.nchu.edu.tw.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 228, 2024 Feb 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373960
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) afatinib and dacomitinib are approved for first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of afatinib and dacomitinib in this setting. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between September 2020 and March 2023, we retrospectively recruited patients diagnosed with advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with first-line irreversible EGFR-TKIs. The enrolled patients were assigned to two groups based on whether they received afatinib or dacomitinib.

RESULTS:

A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study (70 to afatinib and 31 to dacomitinib). The partial response rates (PR) for first-line treatment with afatinib and dacomitinib were 85.7 and 80.6% (p = 0.522). The median progression-free survival (PFS) (18.9 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.975) and time to treatment failure (TTF) (22.7 vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.324) in patients with afatinib and dacomitinib treatment were similar. There was no significant difference observed in the median PFS (16.1 vs. 18.9 months, p = 0.361) and TTF (32.5 vs. 19.6 months, p = 0.182) between patients receiving the standard dose and those receiving the reduced dose. In terms of side effects, the incidence of diarrhea was higher in the afatinib group (75.8% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001), while the incidence of paronychia was higher in the dacomitinib group (58.1% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.004). The PFS (17.6 vs. 24.9 months, p = 0.663) and TTF (21.3 vs. 25.1 months, p = 0.152) were similar between patients younger than 75 years and those older than 75 years.

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that afatinib and dacomitinib had similar effectiveness and safety profiles. However, they have slightly different side effects. Afatinib and dacomitinib can be safely administered to patients across different age groups with appropriate dose reductions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Quinazolinonas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Quinazolinonas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan País de publicação: Reino Unido