Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A life cycle assessment of cardboard waste in low stress grade concrete applications.
Haigh, Robert; Sandanayake, Malindu; Bouras, Yanni; Vrcelj, Zora.
Afiliação
  • Haigh R; Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, 3011, Australia. Electronic address: Robert.Haigh@vu.edu.au.
  • Sandanayake M; Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, 3011, Australia. Electronic address: Malindu.Sandanayake@vu.edu.au.
  • Bouras Y; Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, 3011, Australia. Electronic address: Yanni.Bouras@vu.edu.au.
  • Vrcelj Z; Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, 3011, Australia. Electronic address: Zora.Vrcelj@vu.edu.au.
J Environ Manage ; 354: 120428, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387359
ABSTRACT
Utilising cardboard waste for the partial substitution of cement within concrete has the potential to yield significant sustainability benefits. Cardboard waste is abundantly available, and a significant proportion of this material is disposed of in landfill. However, conversion of waste cardboard into kraft fibres (KFs) for concrete implementation can be utilised in the building and construction industry. Therefore, identification of sustainability variables associated with cardboard waste in concrete is vital. In this study, two KF composites satisfied the criteria for low stress grade concrete and were subsequently evaluated. SFKF5 mix design contained 5% KFs and SFKF105 contained 10% KFs with 5% metakaolin (MK). Both composites had silica fume (SF) as a fibre modification technique for durability purposes. A life cycle assessment (LCA) determined the environmental effect of waste cardboard integration. A Monte-Carlo simulation was utilised as the sensitivity analysis to investigate transportation and energy manufacturing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission variables. LCA results of SFKF105 had a savings of 11%, 8%, 4% and 1% for terrestrial acidification potential, global warming potential (GWP), terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (TEP) and human toxicity potential, respectively. SFKF5 revealed savings of 3%, 2% and 4% for GWP, TEP and marine eutrophication potential, respectively. The additional travel requirements of KFs and MK to the cement batching plant for composite production did not surpass the embodied energy and travel emissions of the control. However, this was negated due to the additional energy requirements to manufacture KFs. The control, SFKF5, and SFKF105 had an average total of 572, 1023 and 997 kgCO2-eq/m3, respectively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indústria da Construção / Gases de Efeito Estufa Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indústria da Construção / Gases de Efeito Estufa Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article