Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Teledermatology in practice: Report of Mayo Clinic experience.
Aghazadeh Mohandesi, Nessa; Puiu, Tudor; Mittal, Setu; Hall, Matthew R; Sokumbi, Olayemi; Mangold, Aaron R; Colgan, Michael B; Tollefson, Megha M; Sartori-Valinotti, Julio C.
Afiliação
  • Aghazadeh Mohandesi N; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Puiu T; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Mittal S; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Hall MR; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Sokumbi O; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Mangold AR; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
  • Colgan MB; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Tollefson MM; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, USA.
  • Sartori-Valinotti JC; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241234581, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410791
ABSTRACT

Background:

Delivery of dermatologic care through telemedicine was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to analyze the teledermatology experience across Mayo Clinic's health care system to identify strengths and limitations of teledermatology.

Methods:

Electronic health records of dermatology televisits were reviewed from multiple U.S. Mayo Clinic sites from January 2020 through January 2021.

Results:

A total of 13,181 dermatology televisits were conducted in 6468 unique patients. Patients were primarily female (60.2%), and mean age of all patients was 34.1 years. Synchronous / live video conferencing visits were the most common (40.0%) telecare modality. Synchronous / live audio conferencing and asynchronous / store-and-forward visits comprised 33.0% and 27.0% of appointments. In total, 3944 televisits (29.9%) were successfully concluded via a single appointment. An in-person appointment was needed for 1693 patients (26.2%) after their initial televisit. For patients with a single televisit, synchronous / live video conferencing was the most common virtual modality (58.0% vs 32.2% of patients with multiple visits, p < 0.001). Patients needing in-person follow-up visits were slightly older than those who did not (mean [SD], 38.8 [22.3] vs 35.0 [23.6] years; p < 0.001) but without any sex-based difference. Around one-third of patients needed an in-person follow-up visit after their initial asynchronous / store-and-forward visit which was higher when compared with synchronous / live audio and video conferencing.

Conclusion:

Single dermatology televisits effectively managed nearly one-third of patients who did not require in-person follow-up. An initial synchronous / live video conferencing was more likely to yield a single clinical encounter, whereas asynchronous / store-and-forward visits required more in-person follow-up. Future studies are required that focus on dermatology-specific cost, diagnoses, access, quality of care, and outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos