Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure.
Canan, Sultan; Inan, Mehmet Arda; Erdem, Ahmet; Demirdag, Erhan; Gündüz, Mualla Ilknur; Erdem, Özlem; Erdem, Mehmet.
Afiliação
  • Canan S; Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Inan MA; Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Erdem A; Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Demirdag E; Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gündüz MI; Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Erdem Ö; Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Erdem M; Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Obstet Gynecol ; 21(1): 22-27, 2024 Mar 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38440964
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The cause of implantation defects in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) has not been clearly established. We aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical changes in HOXA-11, ß1 integrin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), and extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) molecules during the receptive endometrial period in patients with RIF and RPL. Materials and

Methods:

This study was retrospectively conducted at a university hospital. After the exclusion of cases with pathology that may cause a change in the level of receptors in the endometrium, biopsies performed during the receptive period were selected, and the patients were categorized into RPL (n=15), RIF (n=16), control (n=16) groups. All preparations were immunohistochemically stained for HOXA-11, ß1 integrin, FAK, CD44, and ECM1.

Results:

HOXA-11 and ß1 Integrin expression changes were similar between the RIF and control groups. However, FAK expression was significantly increased in the RIF group (p<0.01). Additionally, ECM1 and CD44 expressions were significantly decreased in the RIF group compared with the control group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the endometrial staining of HOXA-11, FAK, and ECM1 in patients with a history of RPL. However, ß1 Integrin and CD44 levels were significantly decreased in the RPL group compared with the control group (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

Implantation is a complex process, and altered adhesion mechanisms involved in endometrial receptivity may be related to defective implantation in patients with RIF and RPL. Among the adhesion molecules, the expression of CD44, ß1 integrin, FAK, and ECM1 molecules varies in inappropriate implantation compared with the normal population.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Obstet Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Obstet Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia