Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frequency and timing of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines; A multi-country cohort event monitoring study.
Raethke, Monika; van Hunsel, Florence; Luxi, Nicoletta; Lieber, Thomas; Bellitto, Chiara; Mulder, Erik; Ciccimarra, Francesco; Riefolo, Fabio; Thurin, Nicolas H; Roy, Debabrata; Morton, Kathryn; Villalobos, Felipe; Batel Marques, Francisco; Farcas, Andreea; Sonderlichová, Simona; Belitser, Svetlana; Klungel, Olaf; Trifirò, Gianluca; Sturkenboom, Miriam C.
Afiliação
  • Raethke M; Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's, Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
  • van Hunsel F; Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's, Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands; Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: f.vanhunsel@lareb.nl.
  • Luxi N; Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Lieber T; Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's, Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
  • Bellitto C; Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Mulder E; Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's, Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
  • Ciccimarra F; Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Riefolo F; Teamit Institute, Partnerships, Barcelona Health Hub, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Thurin NH; Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Roy D; Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU), Southampton, UK; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
  • Morton K; Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU), Southampton, UK; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
  • Villalobos F; Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Batel Marques F; CLPP Vaccines Network, Portugal.
  • Farcas A; Pharmacovigilance Research Center, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Sonderlichová S; Pavol Jozef Safárik University in Kosice, Faculty of Medicine, SLOVACRIN, Slovakia.
  • Belitser S; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Klungel O; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Trifirò G; Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Sturkenboom MC; Department of Biostatistics and Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vaccine ; 42(9): 2357-2369, 2024 Apr 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448322
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, EMA set-up a large-scale cohort event monitoring (CEM) system to estimate incidence rates of patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of different COVID-19 vaccines across the participating countries. This study aims to give an up to date and in-depth analysis of the frequency of patient-reported ADRs after the 1st, 2nd, and booster vaccination, to identify potential predictors in developing ADRs and to describe time-to-onset (TTO) and time-to-recovery (TTR) of ADRs.

METHODS:

A CEM study was rolled out in a period ranging from February 2021 to February 2023 across multiple European countries; The Netherlands, Belgium, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Spain. Analysis consisted of a descriptive analyses of frequencies of COVID-19 vaccine-related ADRs for 1st, 2nd and booster vaccination, analysis of potential predictors in developing ADRs with a generalized linear mixed-effects model, analysis of TTO and TTR of ADRs and a sensitivity analysis for loss to follow-up (L2FU).

RESULTS:

A total of 29,837 participants completed at least the baseline and the first follow-up questionnaire for 1st and 2nd vaccination and 7,250 participants for the booster. The percentage of participants who reported at least one ADR is 74.32% (95%CI 73.82-74.81). Solicited ADRs, including injection site reactions, are very common across vaccination moments. Potential predictors for these reactions are the brand of vaccine used, the patient's age, sex and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The percentage of serious ADRs in the study is low for 1st and 2nd vaccination (0.24%, 95%CI 0.19--0.31) and booster (0.26%, 95%CI 0.15, 0.41). The TTO was 14 h (median) for dose 1 and slightly longer for dose 2 and booster dose. TTR is generally also within a few days. The effect of L2FU on estimations of frequency is limited.

CONCLUSION:

Despite some limitations due to study design and study-roll out, CEM studies can allow prompt and almost real-time observations of the safety of medications directly from a patient-centered perspective, which can play a crucial role for regulatory bodies during an emergency setting such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos / COVID-19 Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos / COVID-19 Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda