Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regeneration of alveolar bone defects in the experimental pig model: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shanbhag, Siddharth; Kampleitner, Carina; Sanz-Esporrin, Javier; Lie, Stein-Atle; Gruber, Reinhard; Mustafa, Kamal; Sanz, Mariano.
Afiliação
  • Shanbhag S; Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Kampleitner C; Center for Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Sanz-Esporrin J; Karl Donath Laboratory for Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Lie SA; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
  • Gruber R; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mustafa K; ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanz M; Center for Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 35(5): 467-486, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450852
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Pigs are emerging as a preferred experimental in vivo model for bone regeneration. The study objective was to answer the focused PEO question in the pig model (P), what is the capacity of experimental alveolar bone defects (E) for spontaneous regeneration in terms of new bone formation (O)?

METHODS:

Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases were searched for studies reporting experimental bone defects or extraction socket healing in the maxillae or mandibles of pigs. The main inclusion criteria were the presence of a control group of untreated defects/sockets and the assessment of regeneration via 3D tomography [radiographic defect fill (RDF)] or 2D histomorphometry [new bone formation (NBF)]. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes RDF and NBF.

RESULTS:

Overall, 45 studies were included reporting on alveolar bone defects or extraction sockets, most frequently in the mandibles of minipigs. Based on morphology, defects were broadly classified as 'box-defects' (BD) or 'cylinder-defects' (CD) with a wide range of healing times (10 days to 52 weeks). Meta-analyses revealed pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) of 50% RDF (36.87%-63.15%) and 43.74% NBF (30.47%-57%) in BD, and 44% RDF (16.48%-71.61%) and 39.67% NBF (31.53%-47.81%) in CD, which were similar to estimates of socket-healing [48.74% RDF (40.35%-57.13%) and 38.73% NBF (28.57%-48.89%)]. Heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was high (I2 > 90%).

CONCLUSION:

A substantial body of literature revealed a high capacity for spontaneous regeneration in experimental alveolar bone defects of (mini)pigs, which should be considered in future studies of bone regeneration in this animal model.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Regeneração Óssea / Perda do Osso Alveolar / Modelos Animais de Doenças Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res / Clin. oral implants res / Clinical oral implants research Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega País de publicação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Regeneração Óssea / Perda do Osso Alveolar / Modelos Animais de Doenças Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res / Clin. oral implants res / Clinical oral implants research Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega País de publicação: Dinamarca