Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Turning up the HEAT: Surgical simulation of the Moses 2.0 laser in an anatomic model.
Wanderling, Christopher; Saxton, Aaron; Phan, Dennis; Doersch, Karen; Shepard, Lauren; Schuler, Nathan; Osinski, Thomas; Quarrier, Scott; Ghazi, Ahmed.
Afiliação
  • Wanderling C; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Saxton A; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Phan D; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Doersch K; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Shepard L; Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Schuler N; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Osinski T; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Quarrier S; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Ghazi A; Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 2024 Mar 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466866
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

With advancements in laser technology, urologists have been able to treat urinary calculi more efficiently by increasing the energy delivered to the stone. With increases in power used, there is an increase in temperatures generated during laser lithotripsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the thermal dose and temperatures generated with four laser settings at a standardized power in a high-fidelity, anatomic model.

METHODS:

Using high-fidelity, 3D printed hydrogel models of a pelvicalyceal collecting system with a synthetic BegoStone implanted in the renal pelvis, surgical simulation of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy was performed with the Moses 2.0 holmium laser. At a standard power (40 W) and irrigation pressure (100 cm H2O), we evaluated operator duty cycle (ODC) variations with different time-on intervals at four different laser settings. Temperature was measured at two separate locations at the stone and ureteropelvic junction.

RESULTS:

Greater cumulative thermal doses and maximal temperatures were achieved with greater ODCs and longer laser activation periods. There were statistically significant differences between the thermal doses and temperature profiles of the laser settings evaluated. Temperatures were greater closer to the tip of the laser fiber.

CONCLUSIONS:

Laser energy and frequency play an important role in the thermal loads delivered during laser lithotripsy. Urologists must perform laser lithotripsy cautiously when aggressively treating large renal pelvis stones, as dangerous temperatures can be reached. To reduce the risk of causing thermal tissue injury, urologists should consider reducing their ODC and laser-on time.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Can Urol Assoc J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Can Urol Assoc J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Canadá