Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Case report: Rapid recovery after intrathecal rituximab administration in refractory anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: report of two cases.
Reda, Mahasen; Jabbour, Rosette; Haydar, Asad; Jaafar, Fatima; El Ayoubi, Nabil; Nawfal, Omar; Beydoun, Ahmad.
Afiliação
  • Reda M; Department of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Jabbour R; Division of Neurology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Haydar A; Division of Neurology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Jaafar F; Department of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • El Ayoubi N; Department of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Nawfal O; Department of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Beydoun A; Department of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1369587, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38510253
ABSTRACT

Background:

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is one of the most prevalent etiologies of autoimmune encephalitis. Approximately 25% of anti-NMDAR encephalitis cases prove refractory to both first- and second-line treatments, posing a therapeutic dilemma due to the scarcity of evidence-based data for informed decision-making. Intravenous rituximab is commonly administered as a second-line agent; however, the efficacy of its intrathecal administration has rarely been reported. Case

summary:

We report two cases of severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis refractory to conventional therapies. These patients presented with acute-onset psychosis progressing to a fulminant picture of encephalitis manifesting with seizures, dyskinesia, and dysautonomia refractory to early initiation of first- and second-line therapeutic agents. Both patients received 25 mg of rituximab administered intrathecally, repeated weekly for a total of four doses, with no reported adverse effects. Improvement began 2-3 days after the first intrathecal administration, leading to a dramatic recovery in clinical status and functional performance. At the last follow-up of 6 months, both patients remain in remission without the need for maintenance immunosuppression.

Conclusion:

Our cases provide evidence supporting the intrathecal administration of rituximab as a therapeutic option for patients with refractory anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Considering the limited penetration of intravenous rituximab into the central nervous system, a plausible argument can be made favoring intrathecal administration as the preferred route or the simultaneous administration of intravenous and intrathecal rituximab. This proposition warrants thorough investigation in subsequent clinical trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encefalite Antirreceptor de N-Metil-D-Aspartato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Front Immunol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Líbano País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encefalite Antirreceptor de N-Metil-D-Aspartato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Front Immunol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Líbano País de publicação: Suíça