Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analyzing the Accuracy of Digital Sizing on Long-Leg Alignment X-rays by Using a 1-Inch Ball Bearing: A Cheap and Effective Method.
VanAken, Trey D; Joiner, Daniel; Boggs, Lauryn; Robinson, Andrew; Haji, Nahel; Vaidya, Rahul.
Afiliação
  • VanAken TD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
  • Joiner D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
  • Boggs L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
  • Robinson A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
  • Haji N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
  • Vaidya R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Cureus ; 16(3): e55735, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38586638
ABSTRACT
Background and objective Sizing on digital films is important for implants and planning deformity correction. CT is the most accurate digital measurement method. We use a 1-inch ball bearing (cost $1) to size our long-leg standing films (LLSFs) when planning deformity correction. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of digital measurements calibrated by this method. Methods We conducted An IRB-approved study involving 25 patients having both an LLSF with a 1-inch ball bearing taped to the inner mid-thigh and a CT scanogram. The longest distance in the axial cut of the bilateral ankle, knee, and femoral heads of the CT images were compared to the same anatomic locations on LLSFs calibrated with the ball bearing using the online digital planning software DetroitBonesetter (DBS) and measurements from our Picture Archiving Communication Software (PACS). Five observers performed each measurement. Results The average measurement differences between the gold standard CT scan and LLSFs calibrated with DBS were as follows 0.110 ± 0.432 mm (femoral head); 2.173 ± 0.0619 mm (knee); and 3.671 ± 0.30 mm (ankle). In PACS, they were as follows 5.470 ± 0.381 mm (femoral head); 6.248 ± 0.712 mm (knee); and 1.806 ± 0.548 mm (ankle). The intraclass correlation coefficient for 600 measurements by five observers was 0.972. Conclusions The $1 ball-bearing sizing on DBS using LLSFs provides accuracy to <1 mm for the femoral head, 2 mm at the knee, and 3.7 mm at the ankle. It was significantly better than the PACS system for both the femoral head and knee (<0.001), while PACS was better at the ankle (<0.001).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos