Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in the Use and Discussion of Race in Pediatrics Articles Over 75 Years.
Nama, Nassr; Panda, Preeti; Montez, Kimberly; Nafiu, Olubukola O; First, Lewis R; Kemper, Alex R.
Afiliação
  • Nama N; Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Panda P; Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
  • Montez K; Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Nafiu OO; Department of Pediatrics and Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • First LR; Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Kemper AR; Department of Pediatrics, Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont and University of Vermont Children's Hospital, Burlington, Vermont.
Pediatrics ; 153(5)2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591136
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Race-based medicine, which falsely assumes that race is biological, is common in the published medical literature. We analyzed trends in the use of race in Pediatrics articles over a 75-year period.

METHODS:

We analyzed a random sample of 50 original research articles published each decade in Pediatrics from 1948 to 2022.

RESULTS:

Of 375 articles, 39% (n = 147) included race. Among articles, 85% (n = 116) used race only to describe study subjects, 7% (n = 9) described race as a social construct, and 11% (n = 15) described race as a biological construct. Only 7% (n = 10) of studies provided a reason for including race. Statements reflective of racial bias or discrimination were identified in 22% (n = 30) of the articles that mentioned race. Although statements concerning for explicit racial bias were uncommon, with none identified in the most recent decade, statements suggestive of implicit racial bias still occurred (22%, 5 of 23). Race was presented as a dichotomy, such as "white/nonwhite," in 9% of studies (n = 12). Regarding currently nonrecommended terminology, the term "minorities" was used in 13% of studies (n = 18); 25% of studies used the term "others" (n = 34), and among these, 91% (n = 31 of 34) did not provide any definition, an occurrence that increased over time at a rate of 0.9%/year.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although there has been improvement over the past 75 years in the reporting of race in published studies in Pediatrics, significant opportunities for further improvement remain.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pediatria / Grupos Raciais / Racismo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pediatria / Grupos Raciais / Racismo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos