Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Similar Medium-Term Revision Rates Following Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly.
Upfill-Brown, Alexander; Shi, Brendan; Mooney, Bailey; Chiou, Daniel; Brodke, Dane; Shah, Akash A; Kelley, Benjamin V; Mayer, Erik N; Devana, Sai K; Lee, Christopher; SooHoo, Nelson F.
Afiliação
  • Upfill-Brown A; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA (Upfill-Brown, Shi, Mooney, Chiou, Brodke, Shah, Kelley, Mayer, Devana, Lee, and SooHoo).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(12): 550-557, 2024 Jun 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595147
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The management of elderly acetabular fractures is complex, with high rates of conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), but potentially higher rates of complications after acute THA.

METHODS:

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database was queried between 2010 and 2017 for all patients aged 60 years or older who sustained a closed, isolated acetabular fracture and underwent ORIF, THA, or a combination. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to identify demographic differences between groups. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate predictors of 30-day readmission and 90-day complications. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the revision surgery-free survival (revision-free survival [RFS]), with revision surgery defined as conversion THA, revision ORIF, or revision THA.

RESULTS:

A total of 2,184 surgically managed acetabular fractures in elderly patients were identified, with 1,637 (75.0%) undergoing ORIF and 547 (25.0%) undergoing THA with or without ORIF. Median follow-up was 295 days (interquartile range, 13 to 1720 days). 99.4% of revisions following ORIF were for conversion arthroplasty. Unadjusted KM analysis showed no difference in RFS between ORIF and THA (log-rank test P = 0.27). RFS for ORIF patients was 95.1%, 85.8%, 78.3%, and 71.4% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. RFS for THA patients was 91.6%, 88.9%, 87.2%, and 78.8% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. Roughly 50% of revisions occurred within the first year postoperatively (49% for ORIF, 52% for THA). In propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference between RFS on KM analysis ( P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS:

No difference was observed in medium-term RFS between acute THA and ORIF for elderly acetabular fractures in California. Revision surgeries for either conversion or revision THA were relatively common in both groups, with roughly half of all revisions occurring within the first year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Ósseas / Redução Aberta / Fixação Interna de Fraturas / Acetábulo Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Ósseas / Redução Aberta / Fixação Interna de Fraturas / Acetábulo Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos