Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of antimicrobial resistance laboratory-based surveillance capacity of hospitals in Zambia: findings and implications for system strengthening.
Yamba, K; Chizimu, J Y; Mudenda, S; Lukwesa, C; Chanda, R; Nakazwe, R; Simunyola, B; Shawa, M; Kalungia, A C; Chanda, D; Mateele, T; Thapa, J; Kapolowe, K; Mazaba, M L; Mpundu, M; Masaninga, F; Azam, K; Nakajima, C; Suzuki, Y; Bakyaita, N N; Wesangula, E; Matu, M; Chilengi, R.
Afiliação
  • Yamba K; Antimicrobial Resistance Coordinating Committee Unit, Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Chizimu JY; Antimicrobial Resistance Coordinating Committee Unit, Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia. Electronic address: chizimuyjoseph@yahoo.com.
  • Mudenda S; Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Lukwesa C; Department of Health, Lusaka District Health Office, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Chanda R; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Nakazwe R; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Simunyola B; Department of Pharmacy, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Shawa M; Hokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Kalungia AC; Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Chanda D; Department of Internal Medicine, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Mateele T; Department of Internal Medicine, Levy Mwanawasa University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Thapa J; Division of Bioresources, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
  • Kapolowe K; Department of Internal Medicine, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Mazaba ML; Antimicrobial Resistance Coordinating Committee Unit, Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Mpundu M; Action on Antibiotic Resistance (ReAct) Africa, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Masaninga F; Department of Health, World Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Azam K; Strengthening Pandemic Preparedness, Eastern and Southern Africa Health Community, Arusha, Tanzania.
  • Nakajima C; Division of Bioresources, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; International Collaboration Unit, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Division of Research Support, Hokkaido University Instit
  • Suzuki Y; Division of Bioresources, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; International Collaboration Unit, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Division of Research Support, Hokkaido University Instit
  • Bakyaita NN; Department of Health, World Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Wesangula E; Strengthening Pandemic Preparedness, Eastern and Southern Africa Health Community, Arusha, Tanzania.
  • Matu M; Strengthening Pandemic Preparedness, Eastern and Southern Africa Health Community, Arusha, Tanzania.
  • Chilengi R; Antimicrobial Resistance Coordinating Committee Unit, Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
J Hosp Infect ; 148: 129-137, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621513
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A well-established antimicrobial resistance (AMR) laboratory-based surveillance (LBS) is of utmost importance in a country like Zambia which bears a significant proportion of the world's communicable disease burden. This study assessed the capacity of laboratories in selected hospitals to conduct AMR surveillance in Zambia.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional exploratory study was conducted among eight purposively selected hospitals in Zambia between August 2023 and December 2023. Data were collected using the self-scoring Laboratory Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Testing Capacity (LAARC) tool.

FINDINGS:

Of the assessed facilities, none had full capacity to conduct AMR surveillance with varying capacities ranging from moderate (63% (5/8)) to low (38% (3/8)). Some of the barriers of AMR-LBS were the lack of an electronic laboratory information system (63% (5/8)) and the lack of locally generated antibiograms (75% (6/8)). Quality control for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), pathogen identification and media preparation had the lowest overall score among all of the facilities with a score of 14%, 20% and 44%, respectively. The highest overall scores were in specimen processing (79%), data management (78%), specimen collection, transport and management (71%), and safety (70%). Most facilities had standard operating procedures in place but lacked specimen-specific standard operating procedures.

CONCLUSION:

The absence of laboratories with full capacity to conduct AMR surveillance hinders efforts to combat AMR and further complicates the treatment outcomes of infectious diseases. Establishing and strengthening LBS systems are essential in quantifying the burden of AMR and supporting the development of local antibiograms and treatment guidelines.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hospitais Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: J Hosp Infect Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Zâmbia País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hospitais Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: J Hosp Infect Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Zâmbia País de publicação: Reino Unido