Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The internal and marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using intra and extraoral scanners: An in-vitro study.
Akhlaghian, Marzieh; Khaledi, Amir-Alireza; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali; Dabiri, Sana; Giti, Rashin; Kadkhodae, Farhad; Gholami, Shabnam.
Afiliação
  • Akhlaghian M; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.
  • Khaledi AA; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.
  • Mosaddad SA; Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
  • Dabiri S; Faculty of Odontology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Bucofacial Prosthesis, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Giti R; Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Kadkhodae F; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.
  • Gholami S; Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0301361, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625957
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The impression technique highly influences the adaptation of ceramic restorations. Not enough information is available to compare the marginal (MF) and internal fit (IF) of endocrowns fabricated with various digitization techniques. Therefore, this in-vitro study aimed to compare the MF and IF of lithium disilicate (LDS) endocrowns fabricated through direct and indirect digital scanning methods. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

One extracted maxillary molar was used to fabricate endocrowns. The digitization of the model was performed with (G1) direct scanning (n = 10) utilizing an intraoral scanner (IOS), (G2) indirectly scanning the conventional impression taken from the model using the same IOS (n = 10), (G3) indirectly digitalizing the obtained impression using an extraoral scanner (EOS) (n = 10), and (G4) scanning the poured cast using the same EOS (n = 10). The MF and IF of the endocrowns were measured using the replica method and a digital stereomicroscope. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze data.

RESULTS:

The studied groups differed significantly (p<0.001). G2 (130.31±7.87 µm) and G3 (48.43±19.14 µm) showed the largest and smallest mean vertical marginal gap, respectively. G2 and G3 led to the highest and lowest internal gaps in all regions, respectively. With significant differences among the internal regions (p<0.001), the pulpal area demonstrated the most considerable misfit in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Scanning the impression using an extraoral scanner showed smaller marginal and internal gaps.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenho Assistido por Computador / Porcelana Dentária Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenho Assistido por Computador / Porcelana Dentária Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã