Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of glycosylated hemoglobin level in patients with cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus with respect to anti-diabetic medication.
Ikramov, Alisher; Mukhtarova, Shakhnoza; Trigulova, Raisa; Alimova, Dilnoza; Abdullaeva, Saodat.
Afiliação
  • Ikramov A; Department of Mathematics, New Uzbekistan University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  • Mukhtarova S; Department of Applied Mathematics and Information Security, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  • Trigulova R; Laboratory of Biomedinformatics, Institute of Mathematics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  • Alimova D; Laboratory of Cardiodiabetes, Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Cardiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  • Abdullaeva S; Laboratory of Cardiodiabetes, Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Cardiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1305640, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38638138
ABSTRACT
Blood glycosylated hemoglobin level can be affected by various factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Frequent measurements are expensive, and a suitable estimation method could improve treatment outcomes. Patients and

methods:

93 patients were recruited in this research. We analyzed a number of parameters such as age, glucose level, blood pressure, Body Mass Index, cholesterol level, echocardiography et al. Patients were prescribed metformin. One group (n=60) additionally was taking sitagliptin. We applied eight machine learning methods (k nearest neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Extra Trees, XGBoost, Linear Regression including Lasso, and ElasticNet) to predict exact values of glycosylated hemoglobin in two years.

Results:

We applied a feature selection approach using step-by-step removal of them, Linear Regression on remaining features, and Pearson's correlation coefficient on the validation set. As a result, we got four different subsets for each group. We compared all eight Machine Learning methods using different hyperparameters on validation sets and chose the best models. We tested the best models on the external testing set and got R2 = 0.88, C Index = 0.857, Accuracy = 0.846, and MAE (Mean Absolute Error) = 0.65 for the first group, R2 = 0.86, C Index = 0.80, Accuracy = 0.75, and MAE = 0.41 for the second group.

Conclusion:

The resulting algorithms could be used to assist clinical decision-making on prescribing anti-diabetic medications in pursuit of achieving glycemic control.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Metformina Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) / Front. endocrinol. (Lausanne) / Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Uzbequistão País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Metformina Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) / Front. endocrinol. (Lausanne) / Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Uzbequistão País de publicação: Suíça