Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the QCI framework suited for monitoring outcomes and costs in a teaching hospital using value-based healthcare principles? A retrospective cohort study.
van Veghel, Willem; van Dijk, Suzanne C; Klem, Taco Mal; Weel, Angelique E; Bügel, Jean-Bart; Birnie, Erwin.
Afiliação
  • van Veghel W; Finance and Control, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands w.veghel@franciscus.nl.
  • van Dijk SC; Department of Geriatrics, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
  • Klem TM; Breast Clinic, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
  • Weel AE; Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
  • Bügel JB; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
  • Birnie E; Finance and Control, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e080257, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692726
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objective is to develop a pragmatic framework, based on value-based healthcare principles, to monitor health outcomes per unit costs on an institutional level. Subsequently, we investigated the association between health outcomes and healthcare utilisation costs.

DESIGN:

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

A teaching hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS:

The study was performed in two use cases. The bariatric population contained 856 patients of which 639 were diagnosed with morbid obesity body mass index (BMI) <45 and 217 were diagnosed with morbid obesity BMI ≥45. The breast cancer population contained 663 patients of which 455 received a lumpectomy and 208 a mastectomy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The quality cost indicator (QCI) was the primary measures and was defined asQCI = (resulting outcome * 100)/average total costs (per thousand Euros)where average total costs entail all healthcare utilisation costs with regard to the treatment of the primary diagnosis and follow-up care. Resulting outcome is the number of patients achieving textbook outcome (passing all health outcome indicators) divided by the total number of patients included in the care path.

RESULTS:

The breast cancer and bariatric population had the highest resulting outcome values in 2020 Q4, 0.93 and 0.73, respectively. The average total costs of the bariatric population remained stable (avg, €8833.55, min €8494.32, max €9164.26). The breast cancer population showed higher variance in costs (avg, €12 735.31 min €12 188.83, max €13 695.58). QCI values of both populations showed similar variance (0.3 and 0.8). Failing health outcome indicators was significantly related to higher hospital-based costs of care in both populations (p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

The QCI framework is effective for monitoring changes in average total costs and relevant health outcomes on an institutional level. Health outcomes are associated with hospital-based costs of care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Neoplasias da Mama / Hospitais de Ensino Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Neoplasias da Mama / Hospitais de Ensino Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Reino Unido